Editorial: New “instructions to authors” of the Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud
Abstract
Recently, the Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud de la Universidad del Cauca (RFSC) was reclassified by the National System of Colciencias Publindex as category C. The long-term maintenance in the national classification or the Indexing the journal in other publishing systems requires a continuous process of improving the quality of the publishing process and published content.Downloads
References
Listado de revistas indexadas en el Índice Bibliográfico Nacional - Publindex I Actualización 2013. Disponible en http://scienti.colciencias.gov.co:8084/ . Fecha de acceso 25 de enero de 2014.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication. Disponible en http://www.icmje.org/
Delgado-Noguera M, Chois P, Calvache JA. El proceso editorial de la Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Revista Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Cauca 2011;13(1):6-7.
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Disponible en http://www.equator-network.org/. Fecha de acceso 6 de diciembre de 2013.
Kenneth F. Schulz, Douglas G. Altman, David Moher, CONSORT Group; CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2010 Jun;152(11):726-732.
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies Disponible en http://www.equator-network.org/. Fecha de acceso 6 de diciembre de 2013.
Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Disponible en http://www.equator-network.org/. Fecha de acceso 6 de diciembre de 2013.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535.
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Disponible en http://www.equator-network.org/. Fecha de acceso 6 de diciembre de 2013.
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE Gatsonis PP, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Lijmer JG, et al. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. British
Medical Journal 2003;326:41-4.
The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development. Disponible en http://www.equator-network.org/. Fecha de acceso 6 de diciembre de 2013.
Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D; CARE Group. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case report guideline development. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jan;67(1):46-51.
.png)
