Observational research and the STROBE statement
Abstract
Observational research is the source of the largest amount of evidence in health care. Their proper use depends on several factors, among them a complete reporting. This article presents the STROBE Statement (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) and its influence on complete research reporting. We recommended the use of the STROBE Statement and their checklist in order to improve the completeness of reporting of observational research and increase its usability.Downloads
References
Sanderson S, Tatt ID, Higgins JP. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;36(3):666-76.
Hernandez-Avila M, Garrido-Latorre F, Lopez-Moreno S. [Epidemiologic study design]. Salud Publica Mex. 2000 Mar-Apr;42(2):144-54.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. [The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies]. Gac Sanit. 2008 Mar-Apr;22(2):144-50.
Sorensen AA, Wojahn RD, Manske MC, Calfee RP. Using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement to assess reporting of observational trials in hand surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Aug;38(8):1584-9 e2.
Papathanasiou AA, Zintzaras E. Assessing the quality of reporting of observational studies in cancer. Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;20(1):67-73.
Fung AE, Palanki R, Bakri SJ, Depperschmidt E, Gibson A. Applying the CONSORT and STROBE statements to evaluate the reporting quality of neovascular age-related macular degeneration studies. Ophthalmology. 2009 Feb;116(2):286-96.
Bastuji-Garin S, Sbidian E, Gaudy-Marqueste C, Ferrat E, Roujeau JC, Richard MA, et al. Impact of STROBE statement publication on quality of observational study reporting: interrupted time series versus before-after analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e64733.
Poorolajal J, Cheraghi Z, Irani AD, Rezaeian S. Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement. Epidemiol Health. 2011;33:e2011005.
Knobloch K, Yoon U, Rennekampff HO, Vogt PM. Quality of reporting according to the CONSORT, STROBE and Timmer instrument at the American Burn Association (ABA) annual meetings 2000 and 2008. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:161.
Da Costa BR, Cevallos M, Altman DG, Rutjes AW, Egger M. Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study. BMJ Open. 2011 Jan 1;1(1):e000048.
Galera Llorca J, Lahoz Grillo R, Roig Loscertales F. [The reporting of observational studies: analysis using the STROBE statement]. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2011 Dec;85(6):583-91.
Blumle A, Meerpohl JJ, Rucker G, Antes G, Schumacher M, von Elm E. Reporting of eligibility criteria of randomized trials: cohort study comparing trial protocols with subsequent articles. BMJ. 2011;342:d1828.
Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D. Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review. Syst Rev. 2012;1:60.
Altman DG. Unjustified restrictions on letters to the editor. PLoS Med. 2005 May;2(5):e126; discussion e52.
Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Clarke M, Julious S, et al. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):267-76.
Calvache JA. Nuevas indicaciones a los autores de la Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Revista Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Cauca 2013;15(3):7-11.
.png)
